We were supposed to have chosen an area or two of interest since last year, read on it, and have our thesis derive out of those interests. However, I simply cannot keep my interest on just one or two things. Even within this semester itself, in the past month or so, I’ve had new areas of interest come up. I need to narrow these down to two in a week or so, so I can write up the proposals, and think of titles.
- Developing a Global Context (or World View). This is in regards to Contextual Theology. I want to show that while all theologies emerge from a context, it does not mean that such “truths” are relative to context, but are universal. In other words, God uses history and life settings to help us interpret the scriptures. For example, Dalit theology is not only for Dalits, but could have truths that transcend the Dalit community into the global community. Contextual theologies also have to be tested. What is truth and what is subjective? That would be a difficult task to develop such a criteria.
- Could Calvinism have emerged from India? This would be a challenge to prove that it can. But it is to show that context does not bias truth, only people do. This would be difficult because I’d have to explore Hindu philosophical systems. After a brief read on Gandhian ideas, I think it could possibly emerge from that system of thought.
- Understanding Calvinism in India and its missiological significance. I find that Calvinism is prematurely struck down in Indian theological circles and badly misunderstood. If Calvinism were understood with the Cross being central, and not the doctrine of predestination, I think it would be empowering to the Church and its missionary activity in this country.
- A critique of the missionary endeavors of the World Council of Churches. When you study the history of the ecumenical movement, you see that it started with a desire to evangelize the world. However, after the WCC was formed, this desire deteriorated. Instead, it has been one of dialogue with other faiths with no desire of evangelism. I would do a study on the Biblical commission to mission and evangelism, and compare it with the actions of the WCC.
- Redefining infant baptism as practiced by the Mar Thoma Church so to be understood rationally from the Scriptures. This was a recent inspiration. My friend’s mom got on the offensive, questioning the need for infant baptism. Her rationalizing made no sense, and also she was in no way ready to listen to what I was saying. However, that irritation inspired this. I felt it was necessary to develop a rational case for it. I say “redefining” only to say that there are certain terms we do not use, such as covenant theology, in the Mar Thoma Church. I think it is implied, but it is not explicitly there. I may or may not go into the mode of baptism, but I don’t know yet.
That’s about it. There were other ideas I had at the beginning of my seminary career here, but have long since scrapped. These are the latest that have been on my mind this year.
Which two I will eventually choose, I haven’t the slightest idea. But it is likely that the WCC one will not make the cut. Maybe the “Contextual Calvinism” will not either. I guess we’ll find out in a few weeks.